Abstract: The study selected eight organizations with extensive authority and profound influence at home and abroad as objects. These included International Organization for Standardization, International Electrotechnical Commission, International Telecommunication Union, American Society for Testing and Materials, European Committee for Standardization, Deutsches Institut fur Normung, British Standards Institution, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. A total of 702 technical committees responsible for advanced materials standardization were reviewed, and 112400 advanced materials standards were collected. The datasets were categorized into seven specialized fields, such as advanced metallic materials, advanced inorganic materials, polymeric materials, electronic component materials, new energy materials, biomedical materials, and green and environmentally friendly materials. Using this dataset,a comparative analysis of the distribution characteristics of advanced materials standards among the eight standard organizations was conducted. The analysis revealed both the strengths and the weaknesses in the standardization landscape for China’s advanced materials industry. Finally, recommendations were made to lead standardization activities in proprietary fields, accelerate the adoption of international standards, align with international standard organizations, and promote mutual recognition and referencing of standards.

Key words: Advanced Materials; Standardization; Internationalization; USA; European