世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 90-100.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2025.11.009 cstr: 32308.14.1006-6055.2025.11.009

• 科技管理与政策 • 上一篇    

中美欧公共数据资产化模式与规则比较分析

秦璇1 林梓瀚2 成子遷3 韦志林2   

  1. 1.江西财经大学会计学院;2.江苏省数据交易所;3.中国现代国际关系研究院
  • 发布日期:2026-02-28
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金“精益数字化赋能单项冠军企业培育的机理及实现路径研究”(23CGL015)

Comparative Analysis of Public Data Assetization Rules and Models in China, the USA and EU

QIN Xuan1 LIN Zihan2 CHENG Zishen3 WEI Zhilin2   

  1. 1.School of Accounting, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics; 2.Jiangsu Data Exchange; 3.China Institute of Contemporary International Relations
  • Published:2026-02-28

摘要: 促进公共数据的资产化及其价值实现是全球主要经济体密切关注的议题。本文通过文献调研与比较分析等定性研究方法,归纳总结中美欧三个经济体在公共数据资产化方面的规则建设与模式,认为中国采用公共数据授权运营的方式构建起公共数据开发利用体系,美国以公共数据开放的方式及培育数据经纪商的方式推动公共数据的开发利用,而欧盟强调公共数据再利用从而加快公共数据的开发利用。通过在产权设定、定价形成与流通交易三个方面的对比研究,本文发现:与美欧相比,我国在公共数据资产的定价规则更具操作性,但在产权与流通交易方面存在可优化的事项。为加快我国的公共数据资产化进程,可继续鼓励数据权益保护的司法实践,促进数据产权的立法,同时加快公共数据全国统一开放平台的建设,以及加强我国数据经纪商的培育。

关键词: 公共数据;数据资产化;流通交易;数据产权;数据经纪商

Abstract: Promoting the assetization and value realization of public data is a key issue of concern for major global economies. Through qualitative research methods such as literature review and comparative analysis, this paper summarizes the rule construction and models of public data assetization in China, the United States, and the European Union. It concludes that China has established a system for the development and utilization of public data through authorized operation, the United States promotes the development and utilization of public data through open access and the cultivation of data brokers, while the European Union emphasizes the reuse of public data to accelerate its development and utilization. Through a comparative study in three aspects,such as property rights delineation, pricing formation, and circulation and trading, it is found that, compared with the U.S. and the EU, China’s pricing rules for public data assets are more operational. However, there is room for optimization in terms of property rights and circulation and trading. To accelerate the assetization of public data in China, it is advisable to continue encouraging judicial practices for data rights protection, promote legislation on data property rights, accelerate the construction of a national unified open platform for public data, and strengthen the cultivation of data brokers in China.

Key words: Public Data; Data Assetization; Circulation and Trading; Data Property Rights; Data Broker