世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 353-360.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2024.11.003 cstr: 32308.14.1006-6055.2024.11.003

• 科技管理与政策 • 上一篇    

美国国防科技评估发展现状、趋势及启示

郝继英   

  1. 军事科学院军事科学信息研究中心
  • 发布日期:2025-06-04

Status Quo, Trend and Enlightenment of US Defense Science and Technology Evaluation

HAO Jiying   

  1. Center for Information Research, Academy of military Science
  • Published:2025-06-04

摘要: 国防科技已成为大国博弈的主要战场,国防科技评估对于面向国家安全的重大战略需求的国防科技创新具有重要作用。本文采用文献调研、内容分析等方法,从立法、行政和民间等组织实施层面分析了美国国防科技评估发展现状,并为我国加强国防科技评估工作提供参考借鉴。研究发现美国国防科技评估体系比较完善,这对其国防科技管理和科技创新发挥了重要作用。此外,美国国防科技评估日益受到高度重视,数理模型逐步纳入评估方法体系,多元化专业化组合渐成评估机构发展主流。其评估立场的独立性、评估理论方法的创新、评估工作的制度化管理等经验值得学习借鉴。

关键词: 国防科技评估;技术评估;发展现状;发展趋势;美国

Abstract: National defense science and technology has become the main battlefield of great power competition. The assessment of national defense science and technology is of great importance for the major strategic needs of national security oriented defense technological innovation. This article adopts the methods of literature research and content analysis to analyze the current situation of U.S. defense science and technology assessment from the perspectives of legislation, administration, and civil society organizations, and provides reference for the improvement of national defense science and technology assessment. The study has found that the U.S. defense technology assessment system is relatively complete, which has played an important role in its defense science and technology management and innovation. In addition, the U.S. defense technology assessment is becoming more and more important, and the mathematical model is gradually included in the evaluation method system, and the diversified specialization combination is becoming the mainstream of the evaluation agency. The independence of its evaluation position, the innovation of the theoretical method of evaluation and the institutional management of the evaluation work are worth learning from.

Key words: Defense Science and Technology Evaluation; Technology Assessment; Development Status; Development Trend; U.S.