世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 341-352.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2024.11.001 cstr: 32308.14.1006-6055.2024.11.001

• 科技管理与政策 • 上一篇    

国际科研评价改革的趋势特征及典型实践

陈卫静 张宇娥   

  1. 电子科技大学图书馆
  • 发布日期:2025-06-04
  • 基金资助:
    电子科技大学”双一流”建设研究支持计划”学术研究的影响力要素与国际评估机制——基于REF的影响力案例研究”(Y03023206100273),四川学术成果分析与应用研究中心项目”学术成果的影响要素研究——以英国REF影响力案例研究为例”(SCAA22-B04)

The Characteristics and Typical Practice of Research Evaluation Reform in the World

CHEN Weijing ZHANG Yu'e   

  1. Library of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
  • Published:2025-06-04

摘要: 立足我国当前所处科研评价改革”破”与”立”的关键时期,本文首先调研了国际上主流的科研评价改革政策,并围绕评价内容、评价标准和评价方法等科研评价的关键环节,归纳总结当前国际科研评价改革的趋势特征,为我国科研评价政策的优化调整提供参考;然后结合国际科研评价改革的重点方向及我国科研评价实施过程中的实践难题,聚焦社会影响力评价、多样性评价和负责任评价,从评价维度、评价指标和评价方法的角度剖析国际上成功的实践经验,为我国科研评价改革政策的有效实施提供借鉴。研究认为,规范社会影响力的评价指标和方法、充分认可不同类型的研究活动和研究成果,并在可比较分析的框架内采用更加开放和包容的评价方法、明确负责任使用量化指标的原则并建立常用量化指标的应用体系,是我国有力推进科研评价改革实施的重要路径。

关键词: 开放科学;科研评价;社会影响力;负责任评价;多样性评价

Abstract: Based on the fact that China is in the critical period of “breaking” and “establishing” in the reform of scientific research evaluation, this paper first investigates the mainstream reform policies of the international scientific research evaluation, and summarizes the characteristics from the dimensions of evaluation content, evaluation criteria and evaluation methods. Then considering the key directions of international research evaluation reform and the practical problems in the implementation of China’s research evaluation, this paper analyzes the social impact evaluation, diversity evaluation and responsible evaluation from the perspectives of evaluation dimensions, evaluation indicators and evaluation methods. It is believed that standardizing the evaluation indicators and methods of social impact evaluation, fully recognizing different types of research activities and research achievements, adopting more open and inclusive evaluation system within the framework of comparable analysis, clarifying the principles of responsible use of quantitative indicators and establishing an application system of commonly used quantitative indicators are important ways to effectively promote the implementation of scientific research evaluation in China.

Key words: Open Science; Scientific Research Evaluation; Social Impact; Responsible Evaluation; Diversity Evaluation