世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 459-475.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2025.04.002 cstr: 32308.14.1006-6055.2025.04.002

• 科技前沿与态势 • 上一篇    

中日固态电池专利对比分析

谢珍1,2 马建霞2 胡文静3   

  1. 1.西安石油大学图书馆;2.中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院文献情报中心;3.兰州大学图书馆
  • 发布日期:2025-07-18

Comparative Analysis of Solid-state Battery Patents between China and Japan

XIE Zhen1,2 MA Jianxia2 HU Wenjing3   

  1. 1. Xi’an Shiyou University; 2. Northwest Institute of Eco-environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences; 3. Lanzhou University
  • Published:2025-07-18

摘要: 固态电池技术作为下一代动力电池的重点方向,其研发动态与产业竞争格局深刻影响全球新能源变革。本文基于专利数据,从研发活跃度、技术主题、竞争力及市场布局等多维系统对比了中日两国固态电池技术的差异化发展路径和竞争格局。研究表明,日本依托早期技术积累与延续性政策支持,聚焦硫化物及卤化物电解质研发,构建了高能量密度技术体系,技术复杂度与创新性指数显著领先,并通过广泛的专利布局形成全球性技术壁垒;中国则依靠政策驱动和市场应用的双轨牵引,在半固态电池产业化、复合电解质体系及低成本工艺优化方面形成差异化优势,但高创新性专利占比不足,海外技术市场布局薄弱。基于此,本文提出“基础研发创新-专利体系保障-技术标准引领-产业生态重构”四位一体策略,为优化中国固态电池技术攻关路径提供数据支撑与策略建议。

关键词: 固态电池;固态电解质;专利分析;中日竞争;聚合物电解质;硫化物电解质;氧化物电解质;复合电解质

Abstract: Solid-state battery technology, as a key frontier for next-generation energy storage systems, profoundly influences the global energy transition through its research and development dynamics and industry competition landscape. This study employs patent data to systematically compare the differentiated development pathways and competitive structures of solid-state battery technologies in China and Japan, including R&D activity, technological themes, competitive advantage, and market deployment. The findings indicate that Japan leverages early technological accumulation and persistent policy support, focusing on the research of sulfide and halide electrolytes to establish a high-energy-density technological framework. Its higher technological complexity and innovation index, along with widespread patent portfolio deployment, have created significant global technological barriers. Conversely, China relies on policy-driven and market-oriented dual-track development, achieving differentiated advantages particularly in semi-solid-state battery commercialization, composite electrolyte systems, and low-cost manufacturing processes. However, the proportion of high-innovation patents is insufficient, and the overseas technical market presence is weak. Based on these findings, this paper proposes an integrated strategy comprising four pillars: basic R&D innovation, patent system protection, technical standards leadership, and industrial ecosystem reconstruction. This strategy aims to provide data support and strategic recommendations for optimizing China’s solid-state battery technology breakthrough path.

Key words: Solid-state Battery; Solid Electrolyte; Patent Analysis; Sino-Japanese Competition; Polymer Electrolyte; Sulfide Electrolyte; Oxide Electrolyte; Composite Electrolyte