世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 561-571.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2025.03.005 cstr: 32308.14.1006-6055.2025.03.005

• 科技管理与政策 • 上一篇    

巴西圣保罗研究基金会科研资助体系分析及启示

王琛1 陆启宇2 朱悦3 周荣华3   

  1. 1.国网上海电科院;2.国网上海市电力公司;3.上海市科学学研究所
  • 发布日期:2025-07-18
  • 基金资助:
    上海市科技创新行动计划“上海鼓励社会力量开展科学捐赠的路径与政策研究”(24692107400)

Research on the Funding System of São Paulo Research Foundation in Brazil

WANG Chen1 LU Qiyu2 ZHU Yue3 ZHOU Ronghua3   

  1. 1. State Grid Shanghai Electric Power Research Institute; 2. State Grid Shanghai Municipal Electric Power Company; 3. Shanghai Institute for Science of Science
  • Published:2025-07-18

摘要: 科研资助体系对于推动科学研究和技术创新具有至关重要的作用。圣保罗研究基金会(FAPESP)是巴西领先的公共研究资助机构之一,在促进巴西乃至全球的科学研究方面提供了许多宝贵的经验和启示。本研究深入分析FAPESP可持续的科研资助体系,发现其具有以下特点:分权制衡的组织架构、充足的科研经费、资金来源与运作模式受法律保护。FAPESP还制定了“教育、科技、人才”三位一体的资助体系结构;构建了比较完善的项目评审机制,以保证资助的有效性。FAPESP在运作模式、资源整合等方面具有较多优点,例如构建多元化的资助体系、充分撬动企业资源、制定有效的运行机制等。最后,本文从构建多元化的资助体系、激发企业的自主性与创造性、完善项目评审制度三个方面提出了对策建议。

关键词: 科研资助体系;巴西圣保罗研究基金会;FAPESP;同行评议;开放科学;“教育、科技、人才”三位一体;三重评审

Abstract: Research funding systems play a crucial role in promoting scientific research and technological innovation. The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) is one of the leading public research funding agencies in Brazil, has contributes a wealth of valuable experiences in advancing scientific research both within Brazil and around the world. This study takes FAPESP as a case to analysis the sustainable research funding system. The characteristics of FAPESP’s funding system are: an organizational structure with checks and balance, substantial and discretionary research funds, and funding source and operational model protected by the constitution. FAPESP has established a Trinity funding system structure of Education, Science and technology and Talent. To ensure the efficiency of funding, FAPESP has established a relatively comprehensive project review mechanism. While FAPESP boasts numerous advantages in its operational model, strategic priorities, and international collaboration initiatives. For instance, it has established a diversified funding system, effectively leverages corporate resources, and has developed efficient implementation mechanisms. Finally, this paper proposes countermeasures and suggestions from three aspects: building a diversified funding system, stimulating the autonomy and creativity of enterprises, and improving the project review mechanism.

Key words: Research Funding System; Brazilian S?o Paulo Research Foundation; FAPESP; Peer Review; Open Science; Integration Technology and Talent; Three-level Review System