世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 127-141.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2025.11.004 cstr: 32308.14.1006-6055.2025.11.004

• 科技管理与政策 • 上一篇    

比利时弗拉芒生物技术研究院产学研融合经验及启示

郑碧   

  1. 上海市科技创业中心
  • 发布日期:2026-02-28
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“高校科技成果转化效能提升的理论建构和管理创新研究(2024—2025)”(24ZDA029),上海市科学技术委员会2025年度高水平机构建设运行计划“软科学研究”项目“全球知名孵化器案例跟踪及对上海启示(2025—2026)”(25692121802)

Insights and Experiences from Belgium VIB's Industry-University-Research Collaboration

ZHENG Bi   

  1. Shanghai Technology Innovation Center
  • Published:2026-02-28

摘要: 本文以比利时弗拉芒生物技术研究院(VIB)为例,梳理其特定的制度背景和发展历程,剖析其特有的“虚拟研究所”模式的成因及经验。研究发现,VIB从区域性创新平台到国际化生物技术创新中心的跨越过程中,充当了特定赛道创新微系统的设计者、运营者和催化者,呈现出规则设计、资源耦合、项目孵化三大核心能力。在此基础上,本文进一步梳理数据和案例,分析其三大能力的构成和效果,论证VIB已从创新生态系统的参与者进化为主导者,主动设计并运营了一套高效的创新价值循环链条,这对我国开展产学研机制改革很有借鉴意义。建议面向我国科研端开展制度和治理模式改革,着力强化制度性供给、创新科研组织模式、拓宽资本链接通道,推进科研端创新生态构建能力重塑,积极提升产学研融合效能,助力高水平科技自立自强和现代化产业体系建设。

关键词: 创新生态;产学研融合;弗拉芒生物技术研究院;治理结构;规则设计;资源耦合;项目孵化

Abstract: This paper examines the Flanders Institute for Biotechnology (VIB) in Belgium as a case study, systematically analyzing its institutional context and developmental trajectory to elucidate the origins and implications of its distinctive “virtual institute” model. The study reveals that throughout VIB’s transformation from a regional innovation platform to an internationally recognized biotechnology hub, it has functioned as the designer, operator, and catalyst of a specialized innovation microsystem, demonstrating three core capabilities: rule design, resource integration, and project incubation. Drawing on empirical data and illustrative cases, this paper further investigates the structure and impact of these capabilities, demonstrating that VIB has evolved from a passive participant into a proactive leader within the innovation ecosystem by establishing and managing an efficient innovation value cycle. These insights offer valuable lessons for advancing reforms in China’s industry-university-research cooperation mechanism. Based on these findings, this paper recommends institutional and governance reforms in China’s research and development (R&D) sector, with a focus on strengthening institutional supply, innovating R&D organizational models, and expanding channels for capital integration. It further calls for the strategic rebuilding of the innovation ecosystem’s capacity to enhance the integration efficiency of industry, academia, and research, thereby supporting high-level self-reliance in science and technology and advancing the construction of a modern industrial system.

Key words: Innovation Ecosystem; Industry-University-Research Collaboration; Flemish Institute for Biotechnology (VIB); Governance Structure; Rule Design; Resource Coupling; Spin Out