世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 1-10.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2026.01.001 cstr: 32308.14.1006-6055.2026.01.001

• 卷首篇 • 上一篇    

构建良好科研生态导向的科技评价体系

陈云伟   

  1. 中国科学院成都文献情报中心
  • 发布日期:2026-02-28
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金专项“主要国家科学基金评审机制变革与创新比较研究”(L2424108)

Building Science and Technology Evaluation System Oriented towards A Healthy Research Ecosystem

CHEN Yunwei   

  1. National Science Library (Chengdu),Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Published:2026-02-28

摘要: 本文论述了科技评价体系改革在构建良好科研生态中的关键作用,探讨了以科研生态为导向的科技评价改革路径。首先分析科技强国建设对良好科研生态的迫切需求,指出科技评价体系改革是营造良好科研生态的关键前提,科技评价改革应回归科学研究本身,构建符合科研规律、激发创新活力、服务国家战略的现代化评价体系。随后剖析我国科技评价体系存在的深层次问题,包括“破四唯”转向“立新标”过程出现指标异化现象、系统性深层评价逻辑顽疾、以及服务国际竞争的评价需求不足等。在此基础上,提出科技评价体系改革的四大路径:夯实科技评价的基础理论与方法、厘清科技评价体系的内在逻辑、探索以对科技创新体系的贡献为导向的科技评价体系、以及健全数据底座与制度体系。

关键词: 科技评价;科研生态;科技强国;破四唯;科技创新;制度体系

Abstract: This paper explores the critical role of research assessment system reform in fostering a healthy research ecosystem and proposes a researchecologyoriented path for reforming the research assessment system. The article first analyzes the urgent need for a robust research ecosystem in building a science and technology power, emphasizing that reforming the research assessment system is a key prerequisite for creating such an ecosystem. Research assessment reform should return to the essence of scientific research, constructing a modern assessment system that aligns with research norms, stimulates innovation, and serves national strategic goals. Subsequently, the article delves into the deepseated issues within China’s research assessment system, including the indicator distortion during process of shifting from “breaking the four sole criteria” to “establishing new benchmarks”, systemic flaws in the underlying logic of assessment, and the inadequacy of assessment systems in meeting international competition demands. Building on this analysis, the article proposes four pathways for reforming the research assessment system: strengthening the theoretical and methodological foundations of research assessment, clarifying the internal logic of the assessment system, exploring a contributionoriented assessment system that focuses on the impact on the innovation system, and establishing a robust data infrastructure and institutional framework.

Key words: Research Assessment; Research Ecosystem; Science and Technology Power; Breaking the Four Sole Criteria; Science and Technology Innovation; Institutional Framework