世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 429-443.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2025.05.005 cstr: 32308.14.1006-6055.2025.05.005

• 科技战略与决策 • 上一篇    

战略使命导向下的英国科技资源配置实践与启示

刘燕1,2 裴瑞敏1,2   

  1. 1.中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院;2.中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院
  • 发布日期:2025-07-18
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金委员会专项“新时期自然科学基金人才培养战略研究”(L2424118)

UK‘s Science and Technology Resources Allocation Driven by Strategic Mission: Practices and Implications

LIU Yan1,2 PEI Ruimin1,2   

  1. 1.Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2. School of Public and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Published:2025-07-18

摘要: 以国家科技战略需求为导向统筹多方力量,高效配置科技资源,对提升科技竞争实力具有重要意义。英国作为传统科技创新强国,通过一系列措施构建了独具特色的科技资源配置体系,推动科技进步与经济增长。本文系统分析英国科技资源配置的实践经历,从发展环境、战略规划设计、战略使命拆解到科技资源配置,探讨英国科技资源配置体系的建设模式。研究发现,英国的科技资源配置机制具有两方面特征:一是将战略使命逐步拆解为具体的行动规划,之后根据行动规划,以科技经费的配置串联起其他科技资源的配置;二是以战略使命为导向构建科技资源“蓄水池”,并以科技资源配置的实践影响战略使命的实现方式。这些经验为中国科技资源的有效配置提供了三方面启示:一是建设稳定且灵活的科技资源配置环境;二是推动战略规划设计与科技资源配置的有机结合;三是以“开放共享”促进科技资源的流动和积累。

关键词: 科技资源配置;战略规划;英国;体系建设;科技创新

Abstract: Effectively coordinating multiple forces and allocating science and technology(S&T) resources in response to national strategic needs is of great significance for enhancing S&T competitiveness. As a traditional powerhouse in scientific and technological innovation, the UK has established a distinctive system for allocating such resources through a series of measures, driving scientific and technological advancement and economic growth. Building on this foundation, this study systematically examines the UK’s practices in allocating S&T resources, exploring its institutional framework from four dimensions: the development context, the design of strategies and plans, the decomposition of strategic missions, and the resource allocation mechanisms. The study finds that the UK’s S&T resource allocation system exhibits two key characteristics: First, strategic missions are gradually broken down into concrete action plans, with research funding allocation serving as a central link connecting other resources. Second, a strategic mission-oriented “reservoir” of S&T resources is built, in which the allocation practices, in turn, shape the implementation pathways of the strategic mission. These experiences offer three key insights for China’s S&T resource allocation: 1) fostering a stable yet flexible institutional environment; 2) integrating strategic planning with resource allocation processes; and 3) enhancing the circulation and accumulation of S&T resources through openness and sharing.

Key words: Allocation of Science and Technology Resources; Strategy and Planning; UK; System Construction; Technological Innovation