世界科技研究与发展 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (S1): 94-106.doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2024.12.103 cstr: 32308.14.1006-6055.2024.12.103

• 科技管理与政策 • 上一篇    

中外关键矿产资源政策比较研究

吉日嘎拉 孙金龙   

  1. 内蒙古财经大学法学院
  • 出版日期:2025-04-30 发布日期:2025-04-30
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古财经大学2024年度高质量科研成果培育基金“关键矿产资源国内外政策动向比较研究”(GZCG24123)

Comparative Study on Critical Mineral Resources Policies of China and Foreign Countries

Jirigala SUN Jinlong   

  1. School of Law, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics
  • Online:2025-04-30 Published:2025-04-30

摘要: 在大国竞争布局矿产资源的背景下,各国纷纷加强了对关键矿产资源的政策布局和战略规划。为给我国制定相关政策和实施行动方案提供有益启示,本文梳理主要关键矿产消费国、供应国与我国在关键矿产领域的相关政策,归纳出主要关键矿产消费国、供应国与我国的政策着力点,并形成与我国在关键矿产政策战略上的比较研究。研究发现,中外政策着力点始终围绕打造关键矿产资源产业链、建立安全稳定的关键矿产供应链、推动技术创新三个领域,但在政策布局上表现出部分差异。一是主要关键矿产消费国与供应国在关键矿产政策上采取了全产业链的考量,从上游端供应、中游端的生产加工、下游应用端都给予了高度关注,而中国则更侧重于上游供应链的稳定与安全。二是强调全球资源配置、技术创新及减少资源依赖以降低供应风险,而中国侧重于保障矿产资源供应安全以支撑经济快速增长和产业升级。鉴于此,中国在完善关键矿产政策体系时,建议着重加强以下几个方面:一是深化全产业链布局;二是加大推动技术创新与产业升级;三是加强国际合作,积极参与国际规则制定。

关键词: 关键矿产资源;主要发达国家;中国;政策战略;比较研究

Abstract: In the context of the strategic layout of major powers in the competition for resources, both China and foreign countries have strengthened their policy layout and strategic planning for critical minerals. By sorting out the major consumer countries, supplier countries, and China’s relevant policies in the field of critical minerals, summarizing the policy priorities of major consumer and supplier countries and China, and conducting a comparative study on China’s policy strategy in critical minerals, to provide actionable insights for China to formulate relevant policies and implement action plans. The policy priorities of both China and foreign countries have always revolved around three areas: building a critical minerals industrial chain, establishing a safe and stable supply chain for critical minerals, and promoting technological innovation. However, there are some differences in policy layout. First, the major consumer and supplier countries have adopted a comprehensive approach to key mineral policy, giving high attention to all links of the industrial chain, from the upstream supply to the midstream production and processing, while China pays more attention to the stability and security of the upstream supply chain. Second, these countries emphasize global resource allocation, technological innovation, and reducing resource dependence to reduce supply risks, while China focuses on ensuring the supply security of mineral resources to support rapid economic growth and industrial upgrading. In light of these findings, when improving China’s policy system for critical minerals, it is suggested that the following areas should be strengthened: deepening the full-industry-chain layout; enhancing technological innovation and industrial upgrading; strengthening international cooperation and actively participating in the formulation of international rules.

Key words: Critical Mineral Resources; Main Developed Countries; China; Policy Strategy; Comparative Studies